On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 07:47:23AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > I think Dave's patch is correct. There's a kfree(output.pointer) at line 359. > > If we fall all the way through without hitting any of the return -ENODEVs, > > we end up doing a 2nd kfree in the out_free: > > There's a second call to acpi_evaluate_object() which takes "output" as > its argument and allocates more memory. yup. I merged your patch. after it's soaked in -next for a day, I'll push it to Linus. (Looks obviously correct, but just being extra careful given where we are in the release cycle) Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
