On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 04:00:23PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Allows removal of printk_once.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> index 208ecf6..f569cff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -693,8 +693,8 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> if (perf->control_register.space_id == ACPI_ADR_SPACE_FIXED_HARDWARE &&
> policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency > 20 * 1000) {
> policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 20 * 1000;
> - printk_once(KERN_INFO "Capping off P-state tranision"
> - " latency at 20 uS\n");
> + DO_ONCE(printk(KERN_INFO
> + "P-state transition latency capped at 20 uS\n"));
ewww. This looks pretty ugly to me. Anyone else?
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
