Joe Perches wrote: > Add a DO_ONCE statement expression analogous to printk_once > that executes any arbitrary statement exactly once. > > This will take the place of printk_once so that > DO_ONCE(pr_<foo>) or any other statement performed > a single time may be easily written. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/kernel.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h > index 883cd44..a5520c9 100644 > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h > @@ -637,6 +637,18 @@ static inline void ftrace_dump(void) { } > #define swap(a, b) \ > do { typeof(a) __tmp = (a); (a) = (b); (b) = __tmp; } while (0) > > +/* > + * Do something once (analogous to WARN_ONCE() et al): > + */ > +#define DO_ONCE(x...) ({ \ > + static bool __done = false; \ > + \ > + if (!__done) { \ > + x; \ > + __done = true; \ Hi Joe, Since x is of arbitrary size & time duration, I think that x; should follow __done = true; instead of being before it, as was done in printk_once(). Otherwise there could be a sizable window there x could be done more than once. > + } \ > +}) > + > /** > * container_of - cast a member of a structure out to the containing structure > * @ptr: the pointer to the member. -- ~Randy LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html