Thomas Renninger wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 12:03:21 Thomas Renninger wrote:
On Sunday 05 April 2009 19:21:29 Howard Chu wrote:
There was a bug in these parts recently which made it into 2.6.29:
I mean the bug was fixed by below commit in 2.6.29, so 2.6.29 should
work fine. It's 2.6.28 I am not sure about whether this works as
expected.
commit 1ca3abdb6a4b87246b00292f048acd344325fd12
Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi<venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Jan 23 09:25:02 2009 -0500
[CPUFREQ] Make ignore_nice_load setting of ondemand work as expected.
The bug was introduced with the micro accounting things, which AFAIK
came in with 2.6.28. I am not sure, but it could be that 2.6.28 still
suffers from that bug. Eventually above patch should be sent to stable@xxxxxxxxxx
now, don't know.
Thanks for the info. I was running 2.6.28, will see how 2.6.29 handles things.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
