On Monday 06 April 2009 12:03:21 Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Sunday 05 April 2009 19:21:29 Howard Chu wrote: > There was a bug in these parts recently which made it into 2.6.29: I mean the bug was fixed by below commit in 2.6.29, so 2.6.29 should work fine. It's 2.6.28 I am not sure about whether this works as expected. > commit 1ca3abdb6a4b87246b00292f048acd344325fd12 > Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri Jan 23 09:25:02 2009 -0500 > > [CPUFREQ] Make ignore_nice_load setting of ondemand work as expected. > > The bug was introduced with the micro accounting things, which AFAIK > came in with 2.6.28. I am not sure, but it could be that 2.6.28 still > suffers from that bug. Eventually above patch should be sent to stable@xxxxxxxxxx > now, don't know. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
