http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12826 --- Comment #32 from Maciej Piechotka <uzytkownik2@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-30 10:08:32 --- (In reply to comment #31) > This bug was for the p4-clockmod API regression. > Per comment #30, that is reverted, and so this entry > should remain closed. > > Thomas and Matthew are right, however, that the interesting > problem is why the r51e needs p4-clockmod to work around the > real bug -- that the the r51e is over-heating. > If we can fix that, perhaps > we can finally clear the way to delete p4-clockmod... > > Maciej, can you file a new bug against r51e over-heating? > re: RSDT > note that 2.6.29 shipped with "acpi=rsdt" -- so you > can test if that helps w/o needing to patch your kernel. > > You'll probably get asked if windows over-heats on the > same laptop, and it would be ideal if you could try that. > It was a long time ago I used Windows on this computer. AFAIR it had not overheat but I'll check it. > Also, there are some more 32 vs 64-bit fixes from ACPICA > that are staged for 2.6.30-rc1 > that may address that issue w/o a bootparam. > We can discuss those in the new bug report. Agains what product should I fill it? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
