http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12826 Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |len.brown@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #31 from Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-03-30 04:47:21 --- This bug was for the p4-clockmod API regression. Per comment #30, that is reverted, and so this entry should remain closed. Thomas and Matthew are right, however, that the interesting problem is why the r51e needs p4-clockmod to work around the real bug -- that the the r51e is over-heating. If we can fix that, perhaps we can finally clear the way to delete p4-clockmod... Maciej, can you file a new bug against r51e over-heating? re: RSDT note that 2.6.29 shipped with "acpi=rsdt" -- so you can test if that helps w/o needing to patch your kernel. You'll probably get asked if windows over-heats on the same laptop, and it would be ideal if you could try that. Also, there are some more 32 vs 64-bit fixes from ACPICA that are staged for 2.6.30-rc1 that may address that issue w/o a bootparam. We can discuss those in the new bug report. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
