On Wednesday 04 February 2009 13:31:11 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:14:31 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think you're right though: smp_call_function_single (or neat wrappers) > > where possible, work_on_cpu which can fail for the others, and we'll just > > have to plumb in the error returns. > > I bet a lot of those can use plain old schedule_work_on(). Which is where work_on_cpu started: a little wrapper around schedule_work_on. We're going in circles, no? Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
