Hi Christine, >> Surely log will be to help a system-manager. >> * The system-manager can suppose that it may be a cause of "A > Processor failed..." that at least LEAVE was thrown away. >> > > Agreed, I have posted a patch below All right. I look forward to your patch. Many Thanks! Hideo Yamauchi. ----- Original Message ----- > From: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: > Date: 2015/4/17, Fri 21:34 > Subject: Re: It is sometimes judged to be node trouble. > > On 17/04/15 12:51, renayama19661014@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> Hi Christine, >> >> >> Thank you for comments. >> >>> I've been looking at it and it's very, very complex to fix. The > code you >>> mentioned that discards the LEAVE (and JOIN) messages was put there to >>> avoid a nasty crash and I'm struggling to find a solution that > doesn't >>> just re-introduce that bug. As you suggest, a message might be helpful >>> though. >> >> >> >> Yes. >> I understand that this correction is very difficult as you say. >> >> Surely log will be to help a system-manager. >> * The system-manager can suppose that it may be a cause of "A > Processor failed..." that at least LEAVE was thrown away. >> > > Agreed, I have posted a patch below > > Chrissie > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
