Re: Corosync performance tuning on 10Gbe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



An,


>> Can you please give a try to corosync 2.x? Is performance still bad (on
> 10GbE)?
> If qpid-cpp-server-cluster or qpid-cpp-server-ha plugins could run with corosync 2.x, I would like to try it.
> 
> Did you ever hear any successful story?
> 

I believe qpid migrated to active-passive HA, so there should be no
longer problem with corosync itself (because corosync communication
layer is not used any more for qpid messages transport).


But this is probably better to ask on qpid ml.

Regards,
  Honza

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux