On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Jan Friesse wrote: > nicolas vigier napsal(a): >> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Steven Dake wrote: >> >>> On 07/10/2012 07:48 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Steven Dake<sdake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Corosync may not be used with pacemaker, but rather using the C APIs. >>>> >>>> I think you mean s/not/not only/ ? >>>> >>> >>> ya brain malfunction >>> >>> thanks for the catch :) >> >> Ah yes, corosync can be used without pacemaker. However, the "Before" >> option in systemd unit file is only used for ordering, when both >> services are installed and enabled, and is independent of the requirement >> dependencies. So this should not make any change for the people who >> don't have a pacemaker service enabled. >> > > I don't like that patch from conceptual point of view. Should really > corosync has Before dependency for EVERY SINGLE ONE service which can use > that? I don't thing so. I believe correct solution is to have Corosync as > dependency in Pacemaker (or any other service). What do you think? Yes, an other option is to use the After option in Pacemaker unit file instead. Maybe it's better as Pacemaker knows all the services it supports. I will submit a patch to Pacemaker. Thanks. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
