nicolas vigier napsal(a):
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Steven Dake wrote:
On 07/10/2012 07:48 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Steven Dake<sdake@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Corosync may not be used with pacemaker, but rather using the C APIs.
I think you mean s/not/not only/ ?
ya brain malfunction
thanks for the catch :)
Ah yes, corosync can be used without pacemaker. However, the "Before"
option in systemd unit file is only used for ordering, when both
services are installed and enabled, and is independent of the requirement
dependencies. So this should not make any change for the people who
don't have a pacemaker service enabled.
I don't like that patch from conceptual point of view. Should really
corosync has Before dependency for EVERY SINGLE ONE service which can
use that? I don't thing so. I believe correct solution is to have
Corosync as dependency in Pacemaker (or any other service). What do you
think?
Honza
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
