Re: IP Failover

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This looks like a pacemaker question, can you try that list?

Regards
-steve

On 06/12/2012 11:31 PM, Yount, William D wrote:
> I have two servers, 10.89.99.31(KNTCLFS001) and 10.89.99.32(KNTCLFS002).
> I am trying to use 10.89.99.30 to float between them in an Active/Active
> cluster.
> 
>  
> 
> I have several services which should be running simultaneously on both
> servers. I am trying to set up an Active/Active cluster. I am using the
> cluster solely for NFS and am using GFS2 for clustered storage. What I
> would like is for either one of the nodes to go out, and the storage to
> still be available. Right now, everything works fine if KNTCLFS002 goes
> out. If KNTCLFS001 goes out instead, then nothing works, which probably
> means that everything was attaching to KNTCFLS001 to begin with. I am
> not sure if I should adjust my stickiness settings.
> 
>  
> 
> The IP address dies, and naturally all the services are unreachable.
> Which causes the storage to no longer be reachable. I am trying to use
> this as storage for VMs and I would like the storage to always be
> available. Can someone look over the attached configuration and let me
> know if any changes are warranted in order to achieve ‘an always’ up NFS
> share? Is there a better solution?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> *William *
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux