On 06/05/2012 06:36 PM, Steven Dake wrote:
On 06/05/2012 01:05 PM, Ted Ross wrote:
I see that many of the definitions in corosync/cpg.h have changed since
version 1.x. Is there any documented guidance as to how a user of
corosync should most properly migrate to version 2.0, or more
specifically, how to conditionally use either 1.x or 2.0?
I apologize if this is a duplicate question. I did a quick search of
the website and the email archives before asking.
Thanks,
-Ted
This is not documented but should be.
I would expect the CPG interface would "just work" without modification.
We generally have a rule that we don't delete functions but only add on.
Regards
-steve
Thanks Steve,
It looks like we're using deprecated types like "cpg_error_t". I assume
it's safe to just switch over to cs_error_t as that definition is also
in 1.x.
Thanks for the reply,
-Ted
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
