Re: Migrating to Corosync 2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/05/2012 01:05 PM, Ted Ross wrote:
> I see that many of the definitions in corosync/cpg.h have changed since
> version 1.x.  Is there any documented guidance as to how a user of
> corosync should most properly migrate to version 2.0, or more
> specifically, how to conditionally use either 1.x or 2.0?
> 
> I apologize if this is a duplicate question.  I did a quick search of
> the website and the email archives before asking.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Ted
> 

This is not documented but should be.

I would expect the CPG interface would "just work" without modification.
 We generally have a rule that we don't delete functions but only add on.

Regards
-steve

> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux