On 6/5/2012 9:11 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Steven Dake napsal(a): >> On 06/04/2012 08:49 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: >>> Steven Dake napsal(a): >>>> Why not use strftime()? >>>> >>> >>> I didn't know that function. But actually, I don't see any benefit in >>> using that. >>> >> >> Current implementation looks fragile, whereas libc strftime >> theoretically would be well maintained by people interested in that sort >> of functionality. > > I don't agree. > There is actually a portability issue here. The various time related structures don´t have the same size and/or precisions across architectures (even within Linux). strftime does take care of that for you, while you need to handle it manually otherwise. We spotted this problem many moons ago when handling qdiskd timestamps on disk across multi arch clusters. Fabio _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
