Re: [PATCH 1/2] Store fdata with timestamp and pid in name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/04/2012 08:49 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Steven Dake napsal(a):
>> Why not use strftime()?
>>
> 
> I didn't know that function. But actually, I don't see any benefit in
> using that.
> 

Current implementation looks fragile, whereas libc strftime
theoretically would be well maintained by people interested in that sort
of functionality.

Regards
-steve
>> On 06/04/2012 02:30 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
>>> This should allow easier handling of various blackbox dumps. Original
>>> fdata name is now symlink to latest created dump.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Friesse<jfriesse@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   exec/main.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>   1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/exec/main.c b/exec/main.c
>>> index 46fab92..d400df7 100644
>>> --- a/exec/main.c
>>> +++ b/exec/main.c
>>> @@ -188,6 +188,27 @@ void corosync_state_dump (void)
> 

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux