Let me try rephrasing the question.
I thought a service such as DLCK was being provided in OpenAis as it's not part of corosync. So if someone was planning on using distributed locking for some applications, would they have to develop it themselves now, as corosync doesn't provide it directly ?
Not quite sure what you mean when you say "Or you can use corosync". Do you mean corosync already provides DLCK in some way or that it's not needed ? Would appreciate some clarification.
Not quite sure what you mean when you say "Or you can use corosync". Do you mean corosync already provides DLCK in some way or that it's not needed ? Would appreciate some clarification.
Thanks,
Sathya
From: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: sathya bettadapura <s_bettadapura@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie question about Corosync-1.4.2 and Openais-1.1.4
On 03/07/2012 12:53 PM, sathya bettadapura wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Are there plans to move Openais services like AMF
> and DLCK to the corosync project ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sathya
>
I don't have any plans to do this. If you really want SAF might take a
look at opensaf.org.
nother option is to just use corosync directly since it is well tested,
has tens of thousands of deployments, and available everywhere with a
dedicated upstream.
Regards
-steve
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* sathya bettadapura <s_bettadapura@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc:* "discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Monday, February 27, 2012 4:28 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Newbie question about Corosync-1.4.2 and
> Openais-1.1.4
>
> On 02/27/2012 05:02 PM, sathya bettadapura wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Let me start off with an apology if this is not the right group to post
>> a newbie question, as looking at the archives it appears to be meant for
>> more serious discussion. But as I couldn't find any FAQ or a user group
>> mailing list, I am posting it here.
>>
>> For starters, I was able to build corosync-1.4.2 and install it on two
>> nodes and execute a few test programs and all that works fine.
>>
>> But I have problems running openasi. Recent version of Openais such as
>> the branch "wilson" or 1.1.4 execute the binary "corosync" with
>> COROSYNC_DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE set to
>> "openaisserviceenableexperimental:corosync_parser". I'm trying to follow
>> the instructions in README.amf and running into basic problems in
>> starting openais services, problems which are probably related to some
>> missing configuration settings or probably misconfiguration.
>>
>> 1) Looking at the log file where corosync logs its mesages, it looks
>> like corsync is up and ready to serve, but openais didn't even open
>> "amf.conf" (I have verified that the config file does exist where it's
>> expected to and in addition also in /etc/corosync/conf, the default
>> location for amf.conf).
>>
>> 2) In the openais source tree, README.amf which describes how to test
>> basic AMF functionlaity refers to a test program called "testamf1",
>> which is missing in the Makefile under the "test" directory. If you run
>> make from the top level, it makes a bunch of other test programs but not
>> "testamf1" (I modified the Makefile to produce "testamf1" too before
>> attempting to run openais). Does anyone know if the Makefile been
>> modified deliberately to omit making "testamf1" (version 0.80.6 appears
>> to have has "testamf1") ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sathya
>>
>
> openais is no longer maintained. See: http://www.openais.org/doku.php
> for the rationale
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
