> On 25 Nov 2014, at 8:54 pm, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2014-11-24T16:16:05, "Fabio M. Di Nitto" <fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Yeah, well, devconf.cz is not such an interesting event for those who do >>> not wear the fedora ;-) >> That would be the perfect opportunity for you to convert users to Suse ;) > >>>> I´d prefer, at least for this round, to keep dates/location and explore >>>> the option to allow people to join remotely. Afterall there are tons of >>>> tools between google hangouts and others that would allow that. >>> That is, in my experience, the absolute worst. It creates second class >>> participants and is a PITA for everyone. >> I agree, it is still a way for people to join in tho. > > I personally disagree. In my experience, one either does a face-to-face > meeting, or a virtual one that puts everyone on the same footing. > Mixing both works really badly unless the team already knows each > other. > >>> I know that an in-person meeting is useful, but we have a large team in >>> Beijing, the US, Tasmania (OK, one crazy guy), various countries in >>> Europe etc. >> Yes same here. No difference.. we have one crazy guy in Australia.. > > Yeah, but you're already bringing him for your personal conference. > That's a bit different. ;-) > > OK, let's switch tracks a bit. What *topics* do we actually have? Can we > fill two days? Where would we want to collect them? Personally I'm interested in talking about scaling - with pacemaker-remoted and/or a new messaging/membership layer. Other design-y topics: - SBD - degraded mode - improved notifications - containerisation of services (cgroups, docker, virt) - resource-agents (upstream releases, handling of pull requests, testing) User-facing topics could include recent features (ie. pacemaker-remoted, crm_resource --restart) and common deployment scenarios (eg. NFS) that people get wrong. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
