On 22 Sep 2014, at 6:24 pm, Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/s-resource-ordering.html > says that optional ordering is achieved by setting the "kind" attribute > to "Optional". However, the next section > http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/_advisory_ordering.html > says that advisory ordering is achieved by setting the "score" attribute > to 0. Is there any difference between an optional and an advisory > ordering constraint? No. kind=optional is the newer syntax that was intended to be more human friendly > How do nonzero score values influence cluster > behaviour, if at all? score > 0 is equivalent to kind=mandatory > Or is the kind attribute intended to replace all > score settings on ordering constraints? yes > -- > Thanks, > Feri. > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
