Re: Clusterbehaviour if one node is not reachable & fenceable any longer?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



99% of the time, I agree totally. Logs and configs are super helpful. In this case though, I am pretty sure I know exactly what's happening. :)

digimer

On 29/01/14 11:00 AM, emmanuel segura wrote:
as Digimer told, maybe a fencing had failed, but just say i got a
cluster with a service that doesn't switch to other nodes after a
fencing happen, without info and cluster log and without conf, is not good


2014-01-29 Nicolas Kukolja <nicolas.kukolja@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:nicolas.kukolja@xxxxxxxxx>>

    emmanuel segura <emi2fast <at> gmail.com <http://gmail.com>> writes:

     >
     >
     > i think is really hard help you with this kind of infomartion


    What information do think you will need to be able to understand my
    problem/help?
    I'll try to provide whatever may be needed...

    Nicolas


    --
    Linux-cluster mailing list
    Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster




--
esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera




--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster




[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux