On 1/29/2014 12:58 PM, Demetres Pantermalis wrote: > Hello Fabio, > > I was under the impression that this is supported, because there is > extensive documentation and reference in redhat site. Maybe I should have been more clear, but it´s the fence_scsi on emcpower path that is untested/unsupportedd. Both taken separately are. It might very well work, but I can´t sign it off :) > In any case, thank you for the information. > Could you please suggest alternative ways, using the common storage as a > fence device (for example do you support /storage-based death (/sbd)??? you can try fence_sanlock, but again, untested over emcpowerpath (Tech Preview in RHEL). https://alteeve.ca/w/Watchdog_Recovery has a good tutorial. If you are deploying with RHEL (and not Centos) then I suggest you also contact GSS to have a review of your cluster architecture and make sure there are no other caveats in that setup. Fabio -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
