Re: Question about gfs2 and Option 4 of HA stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

OK but except if I miss something in the responses ... my question was more about managing GFS2 stack and FS as Pacemaker resources , no problem at all ?

Thanks again
Alain

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:28:10PM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 13:16 +0100, Moullé Alain wrote:
Hi,

As far as I know the final stack option 4 (with Pacemaker and quorum API
of corosync instead of cman) will be the stack delivered on RHEL7,
always right ?

So my question is about GFS2 : will it be working together with this
last stack ? (knowing that GFS2 was "a little" tied with cman)

Thanks
Alain

There is nothing cman specific about GFS2. It can work with pcs quite
happily, and that is how current upstream/Fedora works these days,
Upstream also happily works more independently, as shown here:
http://people.redhat.com/teigland/cluster4-gfs2-dlm.txt

Dave


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster





[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux