Re: Question about gfs2 and Option 4 of HA stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:28:10PM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 13:16 +0100, Moullé Alain wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > As far as I know the final stack option 4 (with Pacemaker and quorum API 
> > of corosync instead of cman) will be the stack delivered on RHEL7, 
> > always right ?
> > 
> > So my question is about GFS2 : will it be working together with this 
> > last stack ? (knowing that GFS2 was "a little" tied with cman)
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Alain
> > 
> 
> There is nothing cman specific about GFS2. It can work with pcs quite
> happily, and that is how current upstream/Fedora works these days,

Upstream also happily works more independently, as shown here:
http://people.redhat.com/teigland/cluster4-gfs2-dlm.txt

Dave

-- 
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster





[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux