> >> dlm-4 (and thus gfs) requires stonith-ng subsystem of pacemaker to be > >> running, otherwise it is unable to query/perform fencing and many funny > >> things may happen. That's incorrect; dlm_controld runs fine, if not better, by fencing directly rather than indirectly through pacemaker/stonith. It's worth considering if you simply use clvm or gfs2 (without other ha services to managed). > I actually meant default dlm setup, it runs /usr/sbin/dlm_stonith which Right, if no fencing has been configured, the default is to try to get fencing via pacemaker/stonith (via the dlm_stonith agent). (See man dlm.conf for configuring fencing, or http://people.redhat.com/teigland/dlm.conf.5.txt) -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
