Re: bug in GFS2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



25.09.2013 17:25, Pavel Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I am trying to build a two-node cluster for samba, but I'm having some GFS2
> issues.
> 
> The nodes themselves run as virtual machines in KVM (on different hosts), use
> gentoo kernel 3.10.7 (not sure what exact version of vanilla it is based on),
> and I use the cluster-next stack in somewhat minimal configuration (corosync-2
> with DLM-4, no pacemaker).
> 

Just a note.
dlm-4 (and thus gfs) requires stonith-ng subsystem of pacemaker to be
running, otherwise it is unable to query/perform fencing and many funny
things may happen. I believe something was done in the pacemaker code to
allow stonithd (daemon implementing stonith-ng) to be run independently
of the rest of pacemaker.

-- 
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster




[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux