On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 14:05 -0400, David Teigland wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:24:49PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: >> > This folds ops_results and error into one. This enables the >> > error code to trickle all the way to the calling function and the gfs2 >> > mount fails if older dlm_controld is used. >> >> If it's not working then I'd prefer to fix it rather than abandoning the >> idea of making it work. >> Dave >> > > I agree. I use the older dlm_controld regularly and I've not seen any > obvious issues. What is the problem in this case I wonder? > Sorry, I misread the code. The dlm_new_lockspace() still continues to create a new lockspace even if the operations are not provided. So, the fallback option has to be after that rather than calling the function again. -- Goldwyn -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
