Hi, On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 14:05 -0400, David Teigland wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:24:49PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > This folds ops_results and error into one. This enables the > > error code to trickle all the way to the calling function and the gfs2 > > mount fails if older dlm_controld is used. > > If it's not working then I'd prefer to fix it rather than abandoning the > idea of making it work. > Dave > I agree. I use the older dlm_controld regularly and I've not seen any obvious issues. What is the problem in this case I wonder? Steve. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster