Jacek Konieczny napsal(a): > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:19:02AM +0100, Jan Friesse wrote: >> Hi, >> we've discussed this problem with dave, but I would like to get some >> information: >> - What distro are you using? > > PLD Linux > >> - Packages are compiled or disro? > > I am making packages for the distro as a part of my job. > >> - what you mean by "clean shutdown"? This is something like service >> dlm_control stop, or your own script? > > systemd, using the corosync.service unit file provided with corosync > sources (it is far from being 'systemd' native) and the dlm.service Ya, far far away. But it has good reasons... > as comes with dlm sources (includes my patches). > > Shutdown is started by '/sbin/halt' or '/sbin/reboot' using standard > systemd procedure. I have added some rules to make sure Pacemaker is > stopped before the rest, but dlm and corosync order is not affected. > Ok, cool. This is information I was seeking. > Systemd kills dlm_controld first and as soon as it exits its initiates > stop of corosync. Adding an artificial delay between those two fixes my > problem. > Problem may be, that if dlm_controld refuses to exit, maybe (= this is theory) it will kill it anyway. > When calling shutdown scripts by hand or the old SysVinit way (through > other shell scripts), the delay between the two jobs could be > 'naturally' longer. > > Unfortunately, I have been distracted recently by some other, higher > priority, job, so I could not do more investigation in this matter > (still on my TODO, though). > Understand. You gave me enough information anyway, so thanks. > Greets, > Jacek > Regards, Honza -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
