Hi Zaman,
There are some configurations that need to be made to the switch to allow both nics to come up with the same mac. I am by no means a network expert, so I cannot think of the name of the protocol off the top of my head. I am willing to wager that the lack of that configuration is the cause of your packet loss.
On Nov 9, 2012 8:22 PM, "Zama Ques" <queszama@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zama Ques <queszama@xxxxxxxx>; linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, 10 November 2012 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: Packet loss after configuring Ethernet bonding
On 11/09/2012 09:26 PM, Zama Ques wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Need help on resolving a issue related to implementing High Availability at network level . I understand that this is not the right forum to ask this question , but since it is related to HA and Linux , I am asking here and I feel somebody here will have answer to the issues I am facing .
>
> I am trying to implement Ethernet Bonding , Both the interface in my server are connected to two different network switches .
>
> My configuration is as follows:
>
> ========
> # cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
>
> Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.6.0 (September 26, 2009)
>
> Bonding Mode: adaptive load balancing Primary Slave: None Currently
> Active Slave: eth0 MII Status: up MII Polling Interval (ms): 0 Up Delay
> (ms): 0 Down Delay (ms): 0
>
> Slave Interface: eth0 MII Status: up Speed: 1000 Mbps Duplex: full Link
> Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: e4:e1:5b:d0:11:10 Slave queue ID: 0
>
> Slave Interface: eth1 MII Status: up Speed: 1000 Mbps Duplex: full Link
> Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: e4:e1:5b:d0:11:14 Slave queue ID: 0
> ------------
> # cat /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/mode
>
> balance-alb 6
>
>
> # cat /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/miimon
> 0
>
> ============
>
>
> The issue for me is that I am seeing packet loss after configuring bonding . Tried connecting both the interface to the same switch , but still seeing the packet loss . Also , tried changing miimon value to 100 , but still seeing the packet loss.
>
> What I am missing in the configuration ? Any help will be highly appreciated in resolving the problem .
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Zaman
> You didn't share any details on your configuration, but I will assume
> you are using corosync.
> The only supported bonding mode is Active/Passive (mode=1). I've
> personally tried all modes, out of curiosity, and all had problems. The
> short of it is that if you need more that 1 gbit of performance, buy
> faster cards.
> If you are interested in what I use, it's documented here:
> https://alteeve.ca/w/2-Node_Red_Hat_KVM_Cluster_Tutorial#Network
> I've used this setup in several production clusters and have tested
> failure are recovery extensively. It's proven very stable. :)
Thanks Digimer for the quick response and pointing me to the link . I am yet to reach cluster configuration , initially trying to understand ethernet bonding before going into cluster configuration. So , option for me is only to use Active/Passive bonding mode in case of clustered environment.
Few more clarifications needed , Can we use other bonding modes in non clustered environment . I am seeing packet loss in other modes . Also , the support of using only mode=1 in cluster environment is it a restriction of RHEL Cluster suite or it is by design .
Will be great if you clarify these queries .
Thanks in Advance
Zaman
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
