Hi, On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 08:40 -0500, Pak, Mesut wrote: > Below is an excerpt from RH knowledgebase article: DOC-69758 > > "A product we use requires shared storage and GFS is recommended by our vendor. They say: "Please note that GFS2 have unresolvable performance issue with EMS." Are you aware of any performance problems possible with GFS2 and Tibco EMS?" > > Resolution section states: "Red Hat believe that GFS2 is suitable to use with Tibco EMS application." > > "At a discussion between Red Hat Resilient Storage developers and Tibco, a verbal agreement was reached that GFS2 is suitable for Tibco EMS applications going forward." > > I have RHCS running with EMS+GFS2 and so far no issues. > Ok, thats good to know. If you have any information you'd be willing to share regarding how you set that up, then we'd be interested to hear the details. > That being said, I've read about TIBCO's recommendation to avoid GFS2. > That should have been removed or updated on their web site, following a recent meeting. I'm following up at the moment to try and clarify this issue. I've just been out for a couple of days on holiday so I need to catch up with where this has got to now, but to the best of my knowledge it is entirely resolved and there is no issue with using GFS2 and Tibco. Steve. > Can you elaborate on "issues" you had with EMS/GFS2 configuration? > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steven Whitehouse > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 4:38 AM > To: linux clustering > Subject: Re: Tibco EMS on GFS2 > > Hi, > > On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 18:32 +0100, Laszlo Beres wrote: > > Hello, > > > > is there anybody here running Tibco EMS with GFS2? We've got some > > nasty thing recently and I'm interested in others' experiences. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Laszlo > > > I'd be very interested to know what has not worked for you. Please open > a ticket with our support team if you are a Red Hat customer. We are > keen to ensure that people don't run into such issues, but we'll need a > bit more information in order to investigate, > > Steve. > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
