I have still a long way to learn :)
On 28-Sep-2011 1:05 PM, "Digimer" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 09/28/2011 10:02 AM, Ruben Sajnovetzky wrote:
>
> We crossed e-mails :)
> I sent the new-fresh configuration.
> I thought about fencing, the problem is that we have a very "odd"
> configuration because I don't really need fence anything ... Maybe I
> can establish kind of rule like "If Central is not working, Collector cant
> work" or similar, will think on it.
>
> The IP will not be migrated, we have a requirement to have Virtual IP for
> the Central (only), that is why it is configured.
>
> Regarding FS (other member asked why GFS), I don't see the advantage
> because, again, we are not "sharing" the storage.
>
> Thanks
The cluster stack requires fencing. Please read this;
https://alteeve.com/w/Red_Hat_Cluster_Service_2_Tutorial#Concept.3B_Fencing
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digimer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Freenode handle: digimer
Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org
"At what point did we forget that the Space Shuttle was, essentially,
a program that strapped human beings to an explosion and tried to stab
through the sky with fire and math?"
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
