On 09/28/2011 10:02 AM, Ruben Sajnovetzky wrote: > > We crossed e-mails :) > I sent the new-fresh configuration. > I thought about fencing, the problem is that we have a very "odd" > configuration because I don't really need fence anything ... Maybe I > can establish kind of rule like "If Central is not working, Collector cant > work" or similar, will think on it. > > The IP will not be migrated, we have a requirement to have Virtual IP for > the Central (only), that is why it is configured. > > Regarding FS (other member asked why GFS), I don't see the advantage > because, again, we are not "sharing" the storage. > > Thanks The cluster stack requires fencing. Please read this; https://alteeve.com/w/Red_Hat_Cluster_Service_2_Tutorial#Concept.3B_Fencing -- Digimer E-Mail: digimer@xxxxxxxxxxx Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org "At what point did we forget that the Space Shuttle was, essentially, a program that strapped human beings to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math?" -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster