Re: Specifiying interface for cluster traffic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/14/2011 12:31 AM, klusterfsck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Quoting Digimer <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
>> On 08/13/2011 02:53 PM, klusterfsck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> I saw an example config for this but seem to have misplaced the link.
>>> Anyone help me on this?  I need to have the cluster traffic over the
>>> hardwired link so that it doesn't go through the switch.
>>>
>>> Thank You
>>> Ken
>>
>> That depends largely on what kind of cluster you're talking about.
>>
>> -- 
> 
> It is a two machine cluster running drbd on a dedicated link.  We had a
> UPS fail during a power bump and the and the two machines decided they
> were no longer joined.  I saw a configuration for routing cluster
> communications over a dedicated link.  I want to do this with the drbd
> link since the write capacity of the drbd sync is less than the link
> bundle.  Basically take the switch out of the communications loop except
> for the outside traffic.
> 
> Thanks.
> Ken

Sorry, I meant which cluster software are you running? DRBD alone? Red
Hat Cluster Services? Corosync + Pacemaker? Heartbeat + Pacemaker?

-- 
Digimer
E-Mail:              digimer@xxxxxxxxxxx
Freenode handle:     digimer
Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin:       http://nodeassassin.org
"At what point did we forget that the Space Shuttle was, essentially,
a program that strapped human beings to an explosion and tried to stab
through the sky with fire and math?"

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux