On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Martinez-Sanchez, Raul <RMartinez-Sanchez@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I had a similar issue on an IBM M3 system although it was on a rhel5u6. The > way we got it fix was by changing the ipmilam configuration > *location*(attribute lanplus="1" in device element to fencedevice element) > in the cluster.conf file, I am not sure if this would be relevant to you but > just in case …. > > > > I.E. > > > > <method name="1"> > <device name="m3vgc1b-ilo" action="off"/> > <device name="fcswitch1" port="2"/> > <device name="fcswitch2" port="2"/> > </method> > > <method name="1"> > <device name="m3vgc1a-ilo" action="off"/> > <device name="fcswitch1" port="1"/> > <device name="fcswitch2" port="1"/> > </method> > > > <fencedevice agent="fence_ipmilan" power_wait="10" ipaddr="XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX" > lanplus="1" login="Admin" name="m3vgc1b-ilo" passwd="***"/> > <fencedevice agent="fence_ipmilan" power_wait="10" ipaddr="XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX" > lanplus="1" login="Admin" name="m3vgc1a-ilo" passwd="***"/> > > Regards, > > Raúl Martínez Sánchez > > > > Please give me the cluster.conf file > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Manish Kathuria > <mkathuria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am facing a strange problem configuring a two node cluster using > RHCS 4.8. Both nodes are HP Proliant DL 180 G6 servers using HP LO > 100i (IPMI Based). > > When I run the fence_node command to check the fence device > configuration for either of the nodes, it fails giving the following > message in the logs: > > fence_node[nnnn]: Fence of "node1" was unsuccessful > fence_node[nnnn]: Fence of "node2" was unsuccessful > > However, when I run the fence_impilan command using the same > credentials, it executes successfully and is able to switch on, off > and reboot the nodes. The cluster configuration for the fence devices > is: > > IPMI Lan Type > Name: lo1 > IP Address: 172.16.1.x > Login admin > Password passone > Auth Type password > > Name: lo2 > IP Address: 172.16.1.y > Login admin > Password passtwo > Auth Type password > > I have already tried different options for Auth Type (blank, password, > md5). Have also tried using / not using lanplus for both the fence > devices in the Manage Fencing dialog without success. > > Any suggestions ? > Thanks for the tip, I will try that out. Another interesting thing which I discovered subsequently was that the nodes were being fenced by the cluster during testing and its just the command fence_node which fails to execute giving the error message mentioned in the initial mail. Quite surprising. -- Manish -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
