Re: To SELinux or not to SELinux ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Nicolas Ross
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:22 AM
> To: linux clustering
> Subject:  To SELinux or not to SELinux ?
> 
> So, for a cluster, using fencing, gfs, and all the needed tools to run
a cluster, is there
> any reason not to use selinux ? I am looking to see if cluster
operator use or do not
> use selinux...

Beware that "permissive" mode, far from being benign, can be as
expensive as having SELinux enabled.  See
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx/msg08317.html for
some details on GFS and extended attributes.

-Jeff



--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux