This is the single biggest problem with luci. It's ridiculous that the entries cannot be removed from the luci data store. What if there were loads of clusters being managed by luci.... rgh..... And redhat will tell you that the preferred way to manage clusters is using luci because, system-config-cluster is slightly broken and isn't well maintained. I know it sounds painful, but your best choice of action, IMHO, is to go deep and fire up vi,vim,emacs or what have you and create those files by hand. You could use system-config-cluster to get yourself a skeleton but then go back to an editor. The problem with SCC is that it doesn't validate the XML in the config, but it does some simple checks which cause it to puke if you have things in the config it doesn't know about. Newer versions ignore those entries but I believe you could have .. <RumpleStiltskinWasHere /> in the file and it'd be OK... You might be thinking "what on earth wold I put in there that the cluster config tools don't know about?!" and I'd say you might adjust the plock settings.... <dlm plock_ownership="1" plock_rate_limit="0"/> <gfs_controld plock_rate_limit="0"/> which helps GFS1/2 since the default lock rate is some crazy small number like 100p/s. With 5 nodes with only 1G on the backend, this easily increases to 1500p/s or so as far as I know, the cluster config tools know nothing of this option... I've been doing the cluster configs by hand for so long things may have changed but I'd be surprised. Newer luci versions are based on turbogears instead of zope so we'll see how that goes. I'll stick to vi for now.. Ok, rant over, and I really hope this helps you make a decision. Good luck -C On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Wahyu Darmawan <Wahyu.Darmawan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for the response. I will try your recommendations. > > > > > > Regards, > > Wahyu > > > > From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jacob ishak > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:00 PM > To: linux clustering > Subject: Re: Remove Luci on Conga > > > > your fastest option is to re-install lucci and riccies , or use > system-config-cluster for the new cluster > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Wahyu Darmawan <Wahyu.Darmawan@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a problem in the cluster using conga. > Previously I used to luci build clusters. However, there are errors in the > configuration, then I decided to remove cluster. > After the cluster is completed removed, and wanted to build the cluster > re-use Luci, there is an error message, that the name of the cluster and > nodes that I use already exist (the same name that I use to make old and new > cluster name). > The question is, how do I remove totally of Luci and I intend to install it > again? > > Thanks for your attention.. > > > Sincerely, > Wahyu > > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
