Re: service state unchanged when host crashes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:10:07 -0000
"Martin Waite" <Martin.Waite@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Given the nature of the bug, does this mean that the unpatched
> cluster code is unable to relocate services in the event of node
> failure ?

Yes, that means exactly that.


> If so, how can anyone be using this ?

Well, they can't :) As I've mentioned earlier, I've switched to CentOS
after I found out this bug. You can rebuild your own debian package
with provided patch, or you can try to convince debian package
maintainers to include patch into distribution...




-- 
|    Jakov Sosic    |    ICQ: 28410271    |   PGP: 0x965CAE2D   |
=================================================================
| start fighting cancer -> http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/   |

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux