Hi Giacomo, Given the nature of the bug, does this mean that the unpatched cluster code is unable to relocate services in the event of node failure ? If so, how can anyone be using this ? regards, Martin -----Original Message----- From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Giacomo Bagnoli Sent: 28 October 2009 10:20 To: linux clustering Subject: Re: service state unchanged when host crashes Il giorno mer, 28/10/2009 alle 11.03 +0100, Jakov Sosic ha scritto: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:57:50 -0000 > "Martin Waite" <Martin.Waite@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I am running Debian Lenny 64-bit. Is that going to be a problem for > > me ? > > Well maybe. Last time I tried RedHat Cluster Suite on Debian Lenny was > two months ago, and then I had stumbled upon the following bug: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx/msg06018.html > > I don't know if they have fixed that bug... but it resembles totally > to your problem... Node goes down, node gets fenced, service is seen > as down by rgmanager, but there is no action to relocate it to a live > cluster member. That was a start of a project for me, so after that I > migrated to CentOS 5 (which is a free RHEL fork). I've had this bug too using Gentoo and RHCS stable-2. After a bit of investigation I've found the bug and the solution (a small, tiny, trivial 2-line patch to fenced) I've already posted on RH bugzilla but got no response. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512512 The patch worked out for me and cluster is in production from august. Hope it helps. -- Ing. Giacomo Bagnoli Asidev s.r.l. Via Osteria Bianca, 108/A 50053 Empoli (Firenze) E-mail: g.bagnoli@xxxxxxxxxx Web: www.asidev.com -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
