On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Rafael Micó Miranda <rmicmirregs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Andrew > > El mar, 20-10-2009 a las 08:43 +0200, Andrew Beekhof escribió: >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Rafael Micó Miranda >> <rmicmirregs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > This is not the situation as i will not have >> > available a shared storage device, and this will be the first cluster >> > using CMAN to be used in the company (i built the older ones with >> > Linux-HA). >> >> Any particular reason for not using Pacemaker/Linux-HA this time too? >> >> -- >> Linux-cluster mailing list >> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > Yes, there is a reason. As company policy we tend to use as many > products as we can which are released by our software vendors, Red Hat > in this case, so we can have our entire platform under our support and > maintenance contract. Fair enough. > Linux-HA is not supported by any vendor, CMAN is. True if by "Linux-HA" you mean only the Heartbeat messaging and membership layer. Pacemaker (the old Linux-HA resource manager) is supported by Novell on SLES, but only when used in combination with OpenAIS. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
