On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM, brem belguebli<brem.belguebli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We are in the same setup, already doing "Geo-cluster" with other technos and > we are looking at RHCS to provide us the same service level. Usually the concepts are the same. What solution are you using? How does it work, replication or real cluster? > Let's consider this kind of setup, 2 datacenters far from each other by 1 ms > delay, each hosting a SAN array, each of them connected to 2 SAN fabrics > extended between the 2 sites. > > What reason would prevent us from building Geo-clusters without having to > rely on a database replication mechanism, as the setup I would like to > implement would also be used to provide NFS services that are disaster > recovery proof. > > Obviously, such setup should rely on LVM mirroring to allow a node hosting a > service to be able to write to both local and distant SAN LUN's. Does LVM mirroring work with clustered LVM? -- Fajar -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
