these are the logs I get:
In node1:
May 21 11:33:44 NODE1 fenced[3840]: NODE2 not a cluster member after 5 sec post_fail_delay
May 21 11:33:44 NODE1 fenced[3840]: fencing node "NODE2"
May 21 11:33:44 NODE1 shutdown[5448]: shutting down for system halt
in node2:
May 21 11:33:45 NODE2 fenced[3843]: NODE1 not a cluster member after 5 sec post_fail_delay
May 21 11:33:45 NODE2 fenced[3843]: fencing node "NODE1"
May 21 11:33:45 NODE2 shutdown[5923]: shutting down for system halt
what I don´t know is way they lose the connection with the cluster, they are still connected (I only unplug a cable from the service network)
Thanks,
ESG
2009/5/21 Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
What do your logs say? Was fencing ever attempted? completed? Are you pulling the connection that allows for IPMI communication?
On May 21, 2009, at 6:44 AM, ESGLinux wrote:
Hello,
I continue with my 2 node cluster and with strange behaviours (or not....).
I´ll explain the actual situation.
I have a cluster with 2 nodes. I Use IPMI as fencing device and all works fine.
I have two separate networks for the services and for the cluster management. (as I was instructed in this list, thanks for the advice ;-) )
I use a iscsi volumen mounted on the two nodes and with GFS on it.
The problem I have now is that when one of the nodes lose the connection to the service network (I disconnect the cable from the interface) I expect the second node fence this node and take the control of the services. But what I have is that the 2 nodes halt, (no reboot, halt), is this normal?
one detail, the access to the GFS volumen is through this service network. When I pull the cable I lose the connection to it. Can be this the problem?
brassow
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
