Re: GFS performance.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

That worked. thanks a lot.

Yes it does improve performance, however still not as good as ext3 itself.

Regards,
Vikash.

At 11:33 PM 27-04-09, Bob Peterson wrote:
----- "Vikash Khatuwala" <vikash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| Hi Jeff,
|
| I tried that but I could not mount the partition anymore.
|
| # gfs_tool sb /dev/mapper/cvg-vz01 proto no_lock
| You shouldn't change any of these values if the filesystem is
| mounted.
|
| Are you sure? [y/n] y
|
| current lock protocol name = "lock_dlm"
| new lock protocol name = "no_lock"

Hi,

That should be "lock_nolock" not "no_lock".

Regards,

Bob Peterson
Red Hat GFS

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux