RE: GFS performance.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Peterson
> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 11:34 AM
> To: linux clustering
> Subject: Re:  GFS performance.
> 
> | current lock protocol name = "lock_dlm"
> | new lock protocol name = "no_lock"
> 
> Hi,
> 
> That should be "lock_nolock" not "no_lock".

Yes--sorry for the confusion.

Jeff


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux