On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:23:17PM -0300, Flavio Junior wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:58:25PM -0300, Flavio Junior wrote: >> >> I'm using OCFS2 Threshold as 30 seconds (value 61) and my multipath >> >> RDAC devloss timeout was 60 seconds. >> > >> > Aha! That would do it. >> > >> >> Adjust these values seems to solve the problem with incorrect fencing. >> > >> > Good, glad it worked. >> > >> >> Any news I report here, thanks :) >> > >> > Please do so. Also, as a question, what version of ocfs2 are >> > you running? Is this a production environment? >> >> Hi Joel, i'm using 1.4.1 >> [root@pinky ~]# ocfs2console --version >> OCFS2Console version 1.4.1 > > The version of ocfs2console is not the same as the version of > the ocfs2 driver. Is this on EL? What does 'rpm -qa | grep ocfs2' say? > Or if it is mainline, what version of the mainline kernel? Ok, I deserve that ;). [root@cerebro ~]# rpm -qa | grep ocfs ocfs2-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5-1.4.1-1.el5 ocfs2console-1.4.1-1.el5 ocfs2-tools-devel-1.4.1-1.el5 ocfs2-tools-1.4.1-1.el5 I'm using CentOS 5.3 with the last release from oss.oracle.com i've found. PS: Just a ponit, to use o2cb init script with centos I need to commend exit 1 line for lsb-functions check. Everything works fine, maybe lsb-functions "script" isnt a fatal dependency. > >> Yes, i'm interested in use it at production. There is a flow of 4, 5k >> mails by day with 300 maildir's. >> What do you think about it? I was trying to use GFS2 but a simple ls >> /home/* or sending a mail for everyone@xxxxxxxxxxxx hangs GFS2 or even >> GFS (without tunning). > > It most certainly will not hang ocfs2, but maildir might cause > some speed concerns. Indexed directories are only just landing in > mainline ocfs2 - they are not in the production version. So any > directory with more than 1000 entries will be a little slow (just like > ext3 without hcache). > It'll work - people are using it just fine. But large mail dirs > will be a little slow, so you should watch out for that. OK, I can accept that. I'm using ext3 by now, so for some users this can just "dont change". But I dont believe that have most users with thousand mails per folder. Probably just a bit, not something to really worry now. Really thanks for info :). > > Joel > -- Flávio do Carmo Júnior aka waKKu -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster