On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:23:17PM -0300, Flavio Junior wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:58:25PM -0300, Flavio Junior wrote: > >> I'm using OCFS2 Threshold as 30 seconds (value 61) and my multipath > >> RDAC devloss timeout was 60 seconds. > > > > Aha! That would do it. > > > >> Adjust these values seems to solve the problem with incorrect fencing. > > > > Good, glad it worked. > > > >> Any news I report here, thanks :) > > > > Please do so. Also, as a question, what version of ocfs2 are > > you running? Is this a production environment? > > Hi Joel, i'm using 1.4.1 > [root@pinky ~]# ocfs2console --version > OCFS2Console version 1.4.1 The version of ocfs2console is not the same as the version of the ocfs2 driver. Is this on EL? What does 'rpm -qa | grep ocfs2' say? Or if it is mainline, what version of the mainline kernel? > Yes, i'm interested in use it at production. There is a flow of 4, 5k > mails by day with 300 maildir's. > What do you think about it? I was trying to use GFS2 but a simple ls > /home/* or sending a mail for everyone@xxxxxxxxxxxx hangs GFS2 or even > GFS (without tunning). It most certainly will not hang ocfs2, but maildir might cause some speed concerns. Indexed directories are only just landing in mainline ocfs2 - they are not in the production version. So any directory with more than 1000 entries will be a little slow (just like ext3 without hcache). It'll work - people are using it just fine. But large mail dirs will be a little slow, so you should watch out for that. Joel -- Life's Little Instruction Book #347 "Never waste the oppourtunity to tell someone you love them." Joel Becker Principal Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx Phone: (650) 506-8127 -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
