Yes, you can. http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/wiki/FAQ/CMAN#tie_breaker Some examples by qdisk manpage: 3.3. Examples 3.3.1. 3 cluster nodes & 3 routers <cman expected_votes="6" .../> <clusternodes> <clusternode name="node1" votes="1" ... /> <clusternode name="node2" votes="1" ... /> <clusternode name="node3" votes="1" ... /> </clusternodes> <quorumd interval="1" tko="10" votes="3" label="testing"> <heuristic program="ping A -c1 -t1" score="1" interval="2" tko="3"/> <heuristic program="ping B -c1 -t1" score="1" interval="2" tko="3"/> <heuristic program="ping C -c1 -t1" score="1" interval="2" tko="3"/> </quorumd> -- Flávio do Carmo Júnior aka waKKu On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Ralph Zukeb <ralphzukeb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> I tried this, but when I killed the switch for the cluster traffic, >>>>> BOTH nodes got fenced! Can I avoid this? >>>> >>>> Don't kill the switch like that - you're causing a split brain. >>>> Use two switches and multiple interfaces (bonding) to provide network >>>> redundancy. > > Can I use a tie-breaker ip without a quorum disk? > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
