2009/4/22 Mark Watts <m.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:14:49 Ralph Zukeb wrote: >> 2009/4/22 Mrugesh Karnik <mrugeshkarnik@xxxxxxxxx>: >> > On Wednesday 22 Apr 2009 15:25:32 Ralph Zukeb wrote: >> >> Hello again! Thanks for the tips so far. >> >> >> >> How can I ensure that the node holding the services and resources in a >> >> two node cluster keeps holding them if the two nodes cannot see each >> >> other? >> >> >> >> I am not using a quorum disk. >> > >> > <cman two_nodes="1" expected_votes="1"/> >> > >> > Make sure you configure fencing properly though. Also, getting rid of the >> > two_node attribute requires a full cluster restart. >> > >> > Mrugesh >> >> I tried this, but when I killed the switch for the cluster traffic, >> BOTH nodes got fenced! Can I avoid this? > > Don't kill the switch like that - you're causing a split brain. > Use two switches and multiple interfaces (bonding) to provide network > redundancy. > > Mark. I have bonding, but both network paths go over the same physical cable. I want to simulate a cable cut or a switch dying along this stretch of cable. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
