On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:09:26 +0100, Ralph Zukeb <ralphzukeb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/4/22 Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:14:49 +0100, Ralph Zukeb <ralphzukeb@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> 2009/4/22 Mrugesh Karnik <mrugeshkarnik@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>> On Wednesday 22 Apr 2009 15:25:32 Ralph Zukeb wrote: >>>>> Hello again! Thanks for the tips so far. >>>>> >>>>> How can I ensure that the node holding the services and resources in a >>>>> two node cluster keeps holding them if the two nodes cannot see each >>>>> other? >>>>> >>>>> I am not using a quorum disk. >>>> >>>> <cman two_nodes="1" expected_votes="1"/> >>>> >>>> Make sure you configure fencing properly though. Also, getting rid of >> the >>>> two_node attribute requires a full cluster restart. >>>> >>>> Mrugesh >>>> >>> >>> I tried this, but when I killed the switch for the cluster traffic, >>> BOTH nodes got fenced! Can I avoid this? >> >> One option would be to edit the fencing agents to include a different >> delay on both nodes. (e.g. put something like sleep 10 in the fencing >> agent on the secondary node). That will make sure that the secondary >> node loses the fencing shootout. >> > > Thanks. How do I ensure a certain node is secondary? You don't. You arbitrarily pick with one you want to be the primary and doctor the fencing agent to add a delay on the other one, which will thus be made to lose a fencing shootout. Gordan -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
