2009/4/22 Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:14:49 +0100, Ralph Zukeb <ralphzukeb@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> 2009/4/22 Mrugesh Karnik <mrugeshkarnik@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Wednesday 22 Apr 2009 15:25:32 Ralph Zukeb wrote: >>>> Hello again! Thanks for the tips so far. >>>> >>>> How can I ensure that the node holding the services and resources in a >>>> two node cluster keeps holding them if the two nodes cannot see each >>>> other? >>>> >>>> I am not using a quorum disk. >>> >>> <cman two_nodes="1" expected_votes="1"/> >>> >>> Make sure you configure fencing properly though. Also, getting rid of > the >>> two_node attribute requires a full cluster restart. >>> >>> Mrugesh >>> >> >> I tried this, but when I killed the switch for the cluster traffic, >> BOTH nodes got fenced! Can I avoid this? > > One option would be to edit the fencing agents to include a different > delay on both nodes. (e.g. put something like sleep 10 in the fencing > agent on the secondary node). That will make sure that the secondary > node loses the fencing shootout. > > Gordan > Thanks. How do I ensure a certain node is secondary? -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
